Communication Analysis of Interview

Question: Discuss about theCommunication Analysis of Interview. Answer: Introduction This particular piece of paper has tried to focus on a detailed communication analysis of an interview conducted among two persons. Both of them were discussing on a vital topic that does fast food advertising somehow contribute to the childhood obesity or not. It can be stated that conversation among two people regarding a topic can explore several aspects of a topic and through proper communication analysis these aspects can be find out (Harris Graff, 2012). It is regardless to say that the early days corpulence is one of the grave physical condition concerns that has over the time increased morbidity, mortality and has substantial long-term social as well as economic costs. Therefore, discussion is necessary to conduct among two candidates regarding this topic and based on the conversation, analysis would be made. Main Discussion 1stPerson: Throughout the sphere, communities and governments are struggling with the communal and economic physical condition expenses of over-weight and overweight populations. I believe that sedentary lifestyles, long screen time along with not enough exercise are some of the major reasons and of course food (Graff, Kunkel Mermin, 2012). 2ndPerson: I do agree with you and I have found that portion dimensions have augmented radically. Presently, populace cooks less at homes and consume out more. Apart from that, junk foodstuffs and drinks are cheaper and more willingly obtainable in the public areas and schools than healthy snack foods (Chandon Wansink, 2012). 1stPerson: In my surroundings, I have seen that most of the children are becoming overweight at the early period of their life. Apart from that, it can be stated that fatness has been connected with the augmented number of children as well as teenagers diagnosed with the type-2 diabetes (Cairns, Angus, Hastings Caraher, 2013). I have seen that overweight children are as well more probable to become overweight adults and this is no doubt a severe doubt to the society. 2ndPerson: From many research works, I have learnt that early days corpulence has been branded as one of the most severe community health concerns of the 21st century. Therefore, I must say that the strategy that supports healthy eating habits is strongly desirable. However, the mounting accessibility of foods are high enough in fat, salt and sugar (i.e. it is called junk foods) throughout the globe has made eating healthily a challenge (Boulos et al., 2012). 1stPerson: You know what, I have found that in a new strategy declaration on the position of media on fatness, the American Academy of Pediatrics Council on infrastructure and Media has warned the parents that watching TV does not just create the children more inactive, but at the same time influence their consumption behavior. This in turn has severe consequence for their physical condition (Harris et al., 2013). 2ndPerson: I do agree to your point, as the strategy declaration highlights the facts that the troubles of TV screening go further than endorsing immobility. Apart from that I have found that many studies have exposed that the children who expend long time sitting in front of TV are more probable to eat high-calorie foods, junk foods, soft drink, syrupy sodas and gradually grow up to be flabby adults (Boyland Halford, 2013). 1stPerson: You are absolutely correct and I do agree to your point. You know what; I have seen that much pediatrics, children development experts and the media researchers have thoroughly found out that food advertising largely make a payment towards the early days fatness in a number of ways. This generally takes into account the followings like, Huge time spent inspection TV detracts from time that could be spent in physical activity Eye-catching food advertisements on the televisions supports the children to make unhealthful choice of foods Apart from that, I have seen that the cross-promotion of food products and the television characters encourage the children to purchase as well as consume low-nutrient and high-calorie food products (Bernhardt et al., 2013) Most importantly, I have seen that the research works have suggested that children snack excessively at the time of accessing several types of media and at the same time eat less healthy at the time of watching television particularly 2ndPerson: I would like to add to your point that sugared snacks and soft drinks, cereal and fast food advertisements respectively compromise near about 32%, 31% and 9% of all the marketed advertisements respectively. Therefore, it is easily understood that marketing of junk foods to the target children in the society through commercial and social media has significantly become disastrously effective to the health condition of the children (Chandon Wansink, 2012). Conclusion After the detailed communication among the two persons regarding the role of media and TV advertisement on children obesity it has been found that both of them have serious concern on this topic. Therefore, it is understood that the big food companies and the drink corporations are under huge threat from the heath supporters and parents for bombing children with junk food publicity and complicated advertising methods. However, it is necessary to mention that not only the TV advertising influence the children, they can reach the students in nay ways like through new and constantly evolving the media platforms. In this part, some necessary recommendations are required to make to deal with the addressed condition in the society. Recommendation The fast food companies must clearly define the major terms like unhealthful foodstuff, unhealthful food advertising, children and directed to children Constantly and evidently demonstrate unhealthful foodstuff in sole agreement with the administration and methodical strategies Restricting all unhealthful foodstuff advertising on the TV at the times, when the offspring watch TV mostly, i.e. 6am to 9 am and 4pm to 9pm in weekdays and on weekends and school holidays it is from 5am to 12 pm and 4p.m to 9p.m. (Graff, Kunkel Mermin, 2012) It is required to make sure that compliance is regularly monitored Declare the actual bad effects on the packing of the fast foods, so that the children themselves can determine to consume that food or not (Harris Graff, 2012) References Bernhardt, A. M., Wilking, C., Adachi-Mejia, A. M., Bergamini, E., Marijnissen, J., Sargent, J. D. (2013). How television fast food marketing aimed at children compares with adult advertisements.PLoS One,8(8), e72479. Boulos, R., Vikre, E. K., Oppenheimer, S., Chang, H., Kanarek, R. B. (2012). ObesiTV: how television is influencing the obesity epidemic.Physiology behavior,107(1), 146-153. Boyland, E. J., Halford, J. C. (2013). Television advertising and branding. Effects on eating behaviour and food preferences in children.Appetite,62, 236-241. Cairns, G., Angus, K., Hastings, G., Caraher, M. (2013). Systematic reviews of the evidence on the nature, extent and effects of food marketing to children. A retrospective summary.Appetite,62, 209-215. Chandon, P., Wansink, B. (2012). Does food marketing need to make us fat? A review and solutions.Nutrition reviews,70(10), 571-593. Graff, S., Kunkel, D., Mermin, S. E. (2012). Government can regulate food advertising to children because cognitive research shows that it is inherently misleading.Health Affairs,31(2), 392-398. Harris, J. L., Graff, S. K. (2012). Protecting young people from junk food advertising: implications of psychological research for First Amendment law.American journal of public health,102(2), 214-222. Harris, J. L., Sarda, V., Schwartz, M. B., Brownell, K. D. (2013). Redefining child-directed advertising to reduce unhealthy television food advertising.American Journal of Preventive Medicine,44(4), 358-364.